Wednesday, February 21, 2018

Threat to Lake Elsinore: Save the Lake



The Santa Margarita Group of the Sierra Club would like to make you aware of a potential threat to Lake Elsinore’s namesake attraction and thriving eco-system, the lake itself. An activist group from Lake Elsinore will hold an open meeting in opposition to the project on February 26, 2018, at 7 pm, in the VFW Hall in Wildomar.
Sierra Club member and spokesperson for “Save Our Lake,” Linda Ridenour writes, “Now it is our turn to weigh in with the authorities on the madness of changing our lake into a pumped storage project for the benefit of a few entrepreneurs who would turn our lake into a muddy pond to benefit San Diego’s electric energy needs. The City, the Water District, several homeowner groups have all responded to the threat, and now it is our turn to speak up and demand our rights.”
Questions regarding the meeting should be directed to Pete Dawson at
(951) 202-1584.
The following excerpts from reporter Michael Williams description of the project are taken from the August 25, 2017, issue of the Press-Enterprise:
The Vista-based firm Nevada Hydro recently submitted a Notice of Intent to File (a) License Application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on behalf of its Lake Elsinore Advanced Pumped Storage project, popularly known as LEAPS.
Nevada Hydro’s plan calls for construction of a reservoir atop the mountains west of Lake Elsinore and an underground power plant with turbines on the lake’s western edge.
Water from the reservoir would be released downhill to the lake to turn the turbines, generating up to 500 megawatts during peak demand for electricity, which would be conveyed over power lines to Southern California Edison’s and San Diego Gas & Electric’s systems. Water would be pumped from the lake up to the reservoir at night when electrical costs are cheaper.
The project surfaced in the late 1980s and finally reached the commission for a decision in July 2011. The commissioners dismissed the application but allowed the proponents to reapply.
The complete article can be found at:
https://www.pe.com/2017/08/25/dormant-lake-elsinore-electricity-project-powered-up-again/
An update to this information can be found at https://www.pe.com/2018/01/13/revived-lake-elsinore-hydroelectric-project-renews-fears-over-popular-lakes-future/



Monday, January 15, 2018

Press Release: Transportation Workshop

Transportation Experts Address Rail Service for I-15 Corridor

By Mary-Ellen (Elena) Garcia

The dream of traveling quickly and efficiently between Ontario and San Diego on a publicly-funded rail service is, it seems, tantalizingly possible but also challenging to implement. This seems to be the logical conclusion of a half-day workshop held on October 27, 2017, sponsored by the Santa Margarita Group of the Sierra Club. Michael Momeni, Ph.D., workshop organizer, gathered a panel of four experts to address various aspects of such a commuter rail system, including its technical, political, and economic issues. What follows here is a summary of their remarks.
John Rogers, P.E., F.ASCE Los Angeles Section President, addressed the geotechnical considerations of such a project. If a rail line of 106 miles were projected, connecting Rancho Cucamonga and Mission Valley (San Diego), the line would intersect with 9 freeways or highways; 97 highways or watercourse crossings and three railroad crossings.  Ideally it would connect destination hubs between the two end points, such as San Bernardino, Riverside, Corona and so on. Considerations for riders to get to and from the line would include issues such as parking a vehicle, using local public transportation, and ride sharing, to name a few. Right-of-way issues would include the fact that freeway medians could only support either light- or high-speed rail, but not both.  Further, stations on medians would need to provide elevators or stairs for passengers and access from and to parking or loading/unloading areas. Final considerations were the geological realities found along  the 1-15 corridor, such as earthquake fault lines, landslide areas, soil liquefaction, potential for dam inundation and seismic settlement.  This presentation included 17 maps showing where there were potential locations for different types of these geologic constraints.
 John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director for the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), spoke about the next generation rail study and the countywide long-range transportation plan. The RCTC is a member of the Southern California Rail Authority, or MetroLink, and is collaborating with the CalTrans Division of Rail on the Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Study, which will identify and  prioritize rail investments through 2040. The goal of the study is to provide daily train service between Los Angeles’s Union Station and the Coachella Valley. Currently a service development plan is being studied, with anticipated approval by NEPA/CEQA in 2019. The Next Generation Rail Study hopes to identify other high-traffic corridors in the county and to discuss alternative transportation technologies for investment and infrastructure implementation.
Steve Fox, Senior Regional Planner for the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), discussed the Los Angeles-San Bernardino Inter-County Transit and Rail Connectivity Study. Significant improvements in rail service and highway infrastructure are already underway or are being planned for the inter-county corridor. L.A. Metro and the San Bernardino Transportation Authority have joined in this study with a number of goals, one seeking to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of providing both light rail and commuter rail service in the same corridor. Another is to make sure that transportation planning benefits residents of San Bernardino County and serves the Ontario Airport. An overarching goal, subsuming interim study objectives, is to determine the optimum mix of commuter rail, light rail, BRT, and express bus in the corridor. Fleshing out various aspects of the study, slides detailed the inter-county objectives, travel market analysis and transportation alternatives and also presented several maps of potential configurations.
The last speaker was Michelle Boehm, Southern California Regional Director of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, who spoke on high-speed rail development from Ontario to San Diego. The Authority is responsible for planning, designing, building and operating the high-speed rail system, which will run from San Francisco to the Los Angeles basin in under three hours. It will eventually extend to Sacramento and San Diego, 800 miles in all. It will connect all major population centers in California, tie local economies together, provide new mobility options, establish long-term economic growth, and help revitalize station areas.
The Los Angeles to San Diego project section via the Inland Empire is part of Phase 2 of the California High-Speed Rail system. It will connect Los Angeles and San Diego in just 1 hour 20 minutes, and close the existing passenger rail gap between the Inland Empire and San Diego County. This system will use 100% renewable energy, virtually eliminating emissions and improving air quality. Routing alternatives along the approximately 170-mile corridor are currently being evaluated. Stations are being considered in locations including Ontario Airport, San Bernardino, Riverside, Corona, Murrieta, Escondido, and San Diego. The various aspects of the projects, including maps, economic impacts, small business participation, and increased job opportunities, are detailed in the many slides that illustrate her presentation.
Organizer Momeni, Chair of the Transportation Task Force for the Santa Margarita Group, advocates commuter rail for the Inland Empire as he writes:” It would stimulate economic development within the corridor. It would reduce the use of Interstate 15/215 by single commuters.  It would link to the existing commuter train services both in San Diego and Los Angeles counties.  It would improve air quality within the region by removing a large number of commuter cars from the highways. It would improve the safety and quality of life for commuters.”  It was not surprising that his dream was supported by much of what had been covered when the workshop wrapped up at 2:00 pm.
For more information on speakers and copies of the slides used in their presentations, see:

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Lawsuit Challenges Development That Could Doom California's Santa Ana Mountain Lions


TEMECULA, Calif.— Conservation organizations sued the city of Temecula today for approving the Altair housing development, which would endanger the local mountain lion population by disrupting critical wildlife corridors. The groups include the Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Mountain Lion Foundation and Cougar Connection.

Please read the following article:

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2018/altair-housing-development-01-11-2018.php

Thursday, December 14, 2017

ALTAIR project was approved: The Passway to Elimination of the Mountain Lions in our Region



Last night approximately at 9:00 PM, December 12, 2017, the City Council of Temecula approved the ALTAIR application for development. The Council members accepted the plan without any changes. Mayor Edwards made the final decision and pushed the vote forward. She said that the Nature Center will not be acted on in the near future because there is no money or plan for it at this time. Both Mayor Pro Tem Matt Rahn and Councilman Jeff Comerchero agreed that they can do without the Nature Center. In spite of the efforts by the Mayor Pro Tem to eliminate the Nature Center from the proposed plan, Councilmember Michael Naggar adamantly resisted any changes to the proposal. It was retained in the final proposed construction plan.


The final vote for approval was 4 Yes (Edwards, Rahn, Comerchero, and Naggar) and one No (James Stewart). Environmental groups all opposed inclusion for the Nature Center in the final plan. Any opposition group has a 30-day window to file a court action for removal of the Nature Center from the plan.


What is your position? Are you willing to support a legal action to stop the obstruction of the only wildlife corridor in our region?


Monday, December 11, 2017

Explosion of developments in Temecula-Murrieta region, but no mass-transit system

You have noticed that Temecula is building high-density housing on the south side of the Rancho California between Ynez Road and Margarita Road.  The sizes of these developments are large and would impact the vehicular congestion within the area already overused.  Since these are high-density developments, they would impact the traffic on the Interstate 15, and Rancho California. 

An explosion of developments on Butterfield Stage Road between Rancho California and Murrieta Hot Spring Road has already been planned.  These developments are very large and would further squeeze usage of the local roads and the Interstate 15.  ALTAIR development on the western side of the Old Town in Temecula is just one among many others planned for Temecula.

Before long the population of Temecula-Murrieta would exceed 500,000 people.  We are still dependent on a single road, the Interstate 15 for the regional transportation.  The Interstate 15  in Temecula-Murrieta will change to the same status as the traffic on the Interstate 15 between Escondido and the highway 52, near Miramar exit.

What are we planning on alleviating the congested Interstate 15 problem?  Adding an additional lane to each side of the road will not solve the problem. 

http://socanatureguardians.blogspot.com/2017/09/

 We need seriously support a regional electric commuter train, now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqrhOpoE-vs&list=PLHcHUZmaa2M5Pcij_Fe8vniL2BqwbS-2I&index=12



Tuesday, November 28, 2017


November 28, 2017

Honorable Maryann Edwards, Mayor,
Honorable Council Member Dr. Matt Rahn, Mayor Pro-Tem
Honorable Council Member Michael Naggar
Honorable Council Member Jeff Comerchero
Honorable Council Member James Stewart                                  

Subject:  Altair Disposition
At the Nov. 15th, 2017, planning commission meeting, a disturbing decision was made to rubber-stamp the adoption of the proposed Altair housing development.  The Commissioners ignored the basic quality of life arguments and even the legal irregularities that make this site untenable.







Among my many concerns are:
·       Too dense, including a 5-story apartment house;
·       Old Town becomes wedged in between the freeway, homes and another freeway destroying its tourist appeal;









 ·       Creates poorer air quality due to more cars idling on the Western Bypass, side-streets, and I-15;
·       Clogged intersections at Rancho California Rd., Winchester, Ynez, etc.






·       Trapped wildlife, impingements on wildlife corridors 10, 13 and 14;
·       Wildlife crossing degradation with more trespass, trails, and Nature Center;
·       Ignoring requirements of the Multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan and the Fish and Wildlife Agencies;
·       Escarpment and green-hill destruction making Temecula into an LA suburb




Solutions:
1.     Base Case:  no development at the proposed site according to the presently assigned Zoning;
2.     Redesign the presently submitted Altair proposal using a lower density development;
3.     Change to 2-lane, not 4-lane, Western Bypass that accommodates reduced density and is located lower on the hillside;
4.     Implement minimum human impact from the development outside the Western Bypass boundary, particularly on the civic site and Village G;
5.     Redesign the proposed facility to protect the wildlife corridor and I-15 wildlife crossing that includes barriers, law enforcement and conservation of the civic phase parcels without trails, structures, etc.; a minimum human impact.

The Altair development is beautiful as shown on paper, but it doesn’t fit in the proposed western slot of land. The environmental impacts, degradation of the quality of life and diminishing resources in Temecula precludes our City Council accepting the presently proposed ALTAIR development plan. 

Respectfully,

Pam Nelson, Chair Sierra Club, Santa Margarita Group




Sunday, November 5, 2017

Status of Suburban and Commuter Trains in the United Sates as 2013

The following list is an incomplete list of the suburban and commuter train systems in the United States since 2013.  The list would require an update and some information could be incomplete.  But, it is a good starting point for investigation.
_________________________________________________________________________________

City
Name
Official Link
Lines
Stations
System Length
Daily Ridership
1
11
156
3,900
1
9
51
1,600
11
127
592
129,400
11
239
785
296,600
ChicagoSouth Bend
1
20
140
11,500
1
10
34.7
8,300
1
6
33.8
1,500
2
9
47.82

Los Angeles-Orange County-Inland Empire
7
55
512
42,265
Miami/Fort Lauderdale/West Palm Beach
1
18
114.1
13,700
1
6
64
2,100
1
6
51.5
1,000
New HavenNew London
1
13
94.5
1,900
New Jersey/New York Metropolitan Area
11
160
1530
301,746
10
124
1100
345,300
6
120
617.8
286,100
1
12
50
4,300
13
153
465
125,300
1
5
23.7
1,400
Salt Lake City/Ogden/Provo
1
16
142
San Diego/Oceanside
1
8
66
4,800
San Francisco/San Jose
1
32
124.6
58,250
San Jose/Stockton
1
10
138
2,800
San Rafael/Santa Rosa
1
10
43
 ?
Seattle/Tacoma
2
9
132
17,057
WashingtonBaltimore, Maryland/part of West Virginia
3
43
301
31,300
WashingtonNorthern Virginia
2
18
145
19,000


The source for this data 
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suburban_and_commuter_rail_systems