Tuesday, November 28, 2017


November 28, 2017

Honorable Maryann Edwards, Mayor,
Honorable Council Member Dr. Matt Rahn, Mayor Pro-Tem
Honorable Council Member Michael Naggar
Honorable Council Member Jeff Comerchero
Honorable Council Member James Stewart                                  

Subject:  Altair Disposition
At the Nov. 15th, 2017, planning commission meeting, a disturbing decision was made to rubber-stamp the adoption of the proposed Altair housing development.  The Commissioners ignored the basic quality of life arguments and even the legal irregularities that make this site untenable.







Among my many concerns are:
·       Too dense, including a 5-story apartment house;
·       Old Town becomes wedged in between the freeway, homes and another freeway destroying its tourist appeal;









 ·       Creates poorer air quality due to more cars idling on the Western Bypass, side-streets, and I-15;
·       Clogged intersections at Rancho California Rd., Winchester, Ynez, etc.






·       Trapped wildlife, impingements on wildlife corridors 10, 13 and 14;
·       Wildlife crossing degradation with more trespass, trails, and Nature Center;
·       Ignoring requirements of the Multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan and the Fish and Wildlife Agencies;
·       Escarpment and green-hill destruction making Temecula into an LA suburb




Solutions:
1.     Base Case:  no development at the proposed site according to the presently assigned Zoning;
2.     Redesign the presently submitted Altair proposal using a lower density development;
3.     Change to 2-lane, not 4-lane, Western Bypass that accommodates reduced density and is located lower on the hillside;
4.     Implement minimum human impact from the development outside the Western Bypass boundary, particularly on the civic site and Village G;
5.     Redesign the proposed facility to protect the wildlife corridor and I-15 wildlife crossing that includes barriers, law enforcement and conservation of the civic phase parcels without trails, structures, etc.; a minimum human impact.

The Altair development is beautiful as shown on paper, but it doesn’t fit in the proposed western slot of land. The environmental impacts, degradation of the quality of life and diminishing resources in Temecula precludes our City Council accepting the presently proposed ALTAIR development plan. 

Respectfully,

Pam Nelson, Chair Sierra Club, Santa Margarita Group




Sunday, November 5, 2017

Status of Suburban and Commuter Trains in the United Sates as 2013

The following list is an incomplete list of the suburban and commuter train systems in the United States since 2013.  The list would require an update and some information could be incomplete.  But, it is a good starting point for investigation.
_________________________________________________________________________________

City
Name
Official Link
Lines
Stations
System Length
Daily Ridership
1
11
156
3,900
1
9
51
1,600
11
127
592
129,400
11
239
785
296,600
ChicagoSouth Bend
1
20
140
11,500
1
10
34.7
8,300
1
6
33.8
1,500
2
9
47.82

Los Angeles-Orange County-Inland Empire
7
55
512
42,265
Miami/Fort Lauderdale/West Palm Beach
1
18
114.1
13,700
1
6
64
2,100
1
6
51.5
1,000
New HavenNew London
1
13
94.5
1,900
New Jersey/New York Metropolitan Area
11
160
1530
301,746
10
124
1100
345,300
6
120
617.8
286,100
1
12
50
4,300
13
153
465
125,300
1
5
23.7
1,400
Salt Lake City/Ogden/Provo
1
16
142
San Diego/Oceanside
1
8
66
4,800
San Francisco/San Jose
1
32
124.6
58,250
San Jose/Stockton
1
10
138
2,800
San Rafael/Santa Rosa
1
10
43
 ?
Seattle/Tacoma
2
9
132
17,057
WashingtonBaltimore, Maryland/part of West Virginia
3
43
301
31,300
WashingtonNorthern Virginia
2
18
145
19,000


The source for this data 
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suburban_and_commuter_rail_systems